DORA

Preamble (Recital 1 – 106)

Recitals

Chapter I (Article 1 – 4)

General provisions

Article 1

Subject matter

Article 2

Scope

Article 3

Definitions

Article 4

Proportionality principle

Chapter II (Article 5 – 16)

ICT risk management

Section I

Article 5

Governance and organisation

Section II

Article 6

ICT risk management framework

Article 7

ICT systems, protocols and tools

Article 8

Identification

Article 9

Protection and prevention

Article 10

Detection

Article 11

Response and recovery

Article 12

Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery procedures and methods

Article 13

Learning and evolving

Article 14

Communication

Article 15

Further harmonisation of ICT risk management tools, methods, processes and policies

Article 16

Simplified ICT risk management framework

Chapter III (Article 17 – 23)

ICT-related incident management, classification and reporting

Article 17

ICT-related incident management process

Article 18

Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threats

Article 19

Reporting of major ICT-related incidents and voluntary notification of significant cyber threats

Article 20

Harmonisation of reporting content and templates

Article 21

Centralisation of reporting of major ICT-related incidents

Article 22

Supervisory feedback

Article 23

Operational or security payment-related incidents concerning credit institutions, payment institutions

Chapter IV (Article 24 – 27)

Digital operational resilience testing

Article 24

General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

Article 25

Testing of ICT tools and systems

Article 26

Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT

Article 27

Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPT

Chapter V (Article 28 – 44)

Managing of ICT third-party risk

Section I

Key principles for a sound management of ICT third-party risk

Article 28

General principles

Article 29

Preliminary assessment of ICT concentration risk at entity level

Article 30

Key contractual provisions

Section II

Oversight framework of critical ITC third-party service providers

Article 31

Designation of critical ICT third-party service providers

Article 32

Structure of the Oversight Framework

Article 33

Tasks of the Lead Overseer

Article 34

Operational coordination between Lead Overseers

Article 35

Powers of the Lead Overseer

Article 36

Exercise of the powers of the Lead Overseer outside the Union

Article 37

Request for information

Article 38

General investigations

Article 39

Inspections

Article 40

Ongoing oversight

Article 41

Harmonisation of conditions enabling the conduct of the oversight activities

Article 42

Follow-up by competent authorities

Article 43

Oversight fees

Article 44

International cooperation

Chapter VI (Article 45 – 45)

Information-sharing arrangements

Article 45

Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence

Chapter VII (Article 46 – 56)

Competent authorities

Article 46

Competent authorities

Article 47

Cooperation with structures and authorities established by Directive (EU) 2022/2555

Article 48

Cooperation between authorities

Article 49

Financial cross-sector exercises, communication and cooperation

Article 50

Administrative penalties and remedial measures

Article 51

Exercise of the power to impose administrative penalties and remedial measures

Article 52

Criminal penalties

Article 53

Notification duties

Article 54

Publication of administrative penalties

Article 55

Professional secrecy

Article 56

Data Protection

Chapter VIII (Article 57 – 57)

Delegated acts

Article 57

Exercise of the delegation

Chapter IX (Article 58 – 64)

Transitional and final provisions

Section I

Article 58

Review clause

Section II

Amendments

Article 59

Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009

Article 60

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012

Article 61

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014

Article 62

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 600/2014

Article 63

Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011

Article 64

Entry into force and application

Recital 89

Rights of critical ICT third-party service providers

Due to the significant impact of being designated as critical, this Regulation should ensure that the rights of critical ICT third-party service providersan ICT third-party service provider designated as critical in accordance with Article 31 are observed throughout the implementation of the Oversight Framework. Prior to being designated as critical, such providers should, for example, have the right to submit to the Lead Overseerthe European Supervisory Authority appointed in accordance with Article 31(1), point (b) of this Regulation a reasoned statement containing any relevant information for the purposes of the assessment related to their designation. Since the Lead Overseerthe European Supervisory Authority appointed in accordance with Article 31(1), point (b) of this Regulation should be empowered to submit recommendations on ICT riskany reasonably identifiable circumstance in relation to the use of network and information systems which, if materialised, may compromise the security of the network and information systems, of any technology dependent tool or process, of operations and processes, or of the provision of services by producing adverse effects in the digital or physical environment matters and suitable remedies thereto, which include the power to oppose certain contractual arrangements ultimately affecting the stability of the financial entity or the financial system, critical ICT third-party service providersan ICT third-party service provider designated as critical in accordance with Article 31 should also be given the opportunity to provide, prior to the finalisation of those recommendations, explanations regarding the expected impact of the solutions, envisaged in the recommendations, on customers that are entities falling outside the scope of this Regulation and to formulate solutions to mitigate risks. Critical ICT third-party service providersan ICT third-party service provider designated as critical in accordance with Article 31 disagreeing with the recommendations should submit a reasoned explanation of their intention not to endorse the recommendation. Where such reasoned explanation is not submitted or where it is considered to be insufficient, the Lead Overseerthe European Supervisory Authority appointed in accordance with Article 31(1), point (b) of this Regulation should issue a public notice summarily describing the matter of non-compliance.
Table of contents