DORA

Preamble (Recital 1 – 106)

Recitals

Chapter I (Article 1 – 4)

General provisions

Article 1

Subject matter

Article 2

Scope

Article 3

Definitions

Article 4

Proportionality principle

Chapter II (Article 5 – 16)

ICT risk management

Section I

Article 5

Governance and organisation

Section II

Article 6

ICT risk management framework

Article 7

ICT systems, protocols and tools

Article 8

Identification

Article 9

Protection and prevention

Article 10

Detection

Article 11

Response and recovery

Article 12

Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery procedures and methods

Article 13

Learning and evolving

Article 14

Communication

Article 15

Further harmonisation of ICT risk management tools, methods, processes and policies

Article 16

Simplified ICT risk management framework

Chapter III (Article 17 – 23)

ICT-related incident management, classification and reporting

Article 17

ICT-related incident management process

Article 18

Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threats

Article 19

Reporting of major ICT-related incidents and voluntary notification of significant cyber threats

Article 20

Harmonisation of reporting content and templates

Article 21

Centralisation of reporting of major ICT-related incidents

Article 22

Supervisory feedback

Article 23

Operational or security payment-related incidents concerning credit institutions, payment institutions

Chapter IV (Article 24 – 27)

Digital operational resilience testing

Article 24

General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

Article 25

Testing of ICT tools and systems

Article 26

Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT

Article 27

Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPT

Chapter V (Article 28 – 44)

Managing of ICT third-party risk

Section I

Key principles for a sound management of ICT third-party risk

Article 28

General principles

Article 29

Preliminary assessment of ICT concentration risk at entity level

Article 30

Key contractual provisions

Section II

Oversight framework of critical ITC third-party service providers

Article 31

Designation of critical ICT third-party service providers

Article 32

Structure of the Oversight Framework

Article 33

Tasks of the Lead Overseer

Article 34

Operational coordination between Lead Overseers

Article 35

Powers of the Lead Overseer

Article 36

Exercise of the powers of the Lead Overseer outside the Union

Article 37

Request for information

Article 38

General investigations

Article 39

Inspections

Article 40

Ongoing oversight

Article 41

Harmonisation of conditions enabling the conduct of the oversight activities

Article 42

Follow-up by competent authorities

Article 43

Oversight fees

Article 44

International cooperation

Chapter VI (Article 45 – 45)

Information-sharing arrangements

Article 45

Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence

Chapter VII (Article 46 – 56)

Competent authorities

Article 46

Competent authorities

Article 47

Cooperation with structures and authorities established by Directive (EU) 2022/2555

Article 48

Cooperation between authorities

Article 49

Financial cross-sector exercises, communication and cooperation

Article 50

Administrative penalties and remedial measures

Article 51

Exercise of the power to impose administrative penalties and remedial measures

Article 52

Criminal penalties

Article 53

Notification duties

Article 54

Publication of administrative penalties

Article 55

Professional secrecy

Article 56

Data Protection

Chapter VIII (Article 57 – 57)

Delegated acts

Article 57

Exercise of the delegation

Chapter IX (Article 58 – 64)

Transitional and final provisions

Section I

Article 58

Review clause

Section II

Amendments

Article 59

Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009

Article 60

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012

Article 61

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014

Article 62

Amendments to Regulation (EU) No 600/2014

Article 63

Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011

Article 64

Entry into force and application

Recital 15

Inconsistencies in NIS addressed by NIS2

Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7)Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (OJ L 194, 19.7.2016, p. 1). was the first horizontal cybersecurity framework enacted at Union level, applying also to three types of financial entitiesas defined in Article 2, points (a) to (t), namely credit institutionsa credit institution as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, trading venuesa trading venue as defined in Article 4(1), point (24), of Directive 2014/65/EU and central counterpartiesa central counterparty as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012. However, since Directive (EU) 2016/1148 set out a mechanism of identification at national level of operators of essential services, only certain credit institutionsa credit institution as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, trading venuesa trading venue as defined in Article 4(1), point (24), of Directive 2014/65/EU and central counterpartiesa central counterparty as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 that were identified by the Member States, have been brought into its scope in practice, and hence required to comply with the ICT security and incident notification requirements laid down in it. Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council (8)Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (NIS 2 Directive) (see page 80 of this Official Journal). sets a uniform criterion to determine the entities falling within its scope of application (size-cap rule) while also keeping the three types of financial entitiesas defined in Article 2, points (a) to (t) in its scope.
Table of contents